in

: “Twitter Altercation: APC Supporter Clashes with Nigerian Activist Aisha Yesufu”

“Shut your stinking mouth, nobody is inviting you to any table,” tweep trade words with popular activist, Aisha Yesufu
Twitter Altercation APC Supporter Clashes with Nigerian Activist Aisha

A Twitter altercation occurred between an APC supporter and Nigerian activist Aisha Yesufu. The supporter accused Yesufu of only criticizing politicians outside her political camp, to which she responded by calling his mindset laughable. The back-and-forth continued with both parties defending their positions and integrity. Yesufu accused the supporter of hoping to be rewarded by the government, while he accused her and her spouse of corruption. Yesufu, a socio-political advocate, has faced criticism for her positions on national issues. Both parties exchanged insults and challenged each other’s integrity.
 

There was an unusual altercation between an APC supporter and Nigerian activist Aisha Yesufu on Twitter.

The supporter accused Yesufu of bigotry, claiming that she only criticizes politicians who are not in the same party as her.

The supporter, known as Souljah (@jeffphilips1), stated that those who call the president a drug lord and make other accusations against him would rush to him if they received a call at night, even if there were no available flights.

Yesufu quoted the tweet and called the supporter’s mindset laughable.

Both parties exchanged words on Twitter, with the supporter expressing unwavering support for the APC administration.

He claimed that there are people on Twitter with more integrity than Yesufu and challenged her to do research and publish her findings.

Yesufu responded, stating that she will never have the supporter’s kind of integrity and mocked his aspirations to be noticed and rewarded by the government.

The supporter accused Yesufu and her spouse of corruption, to which she responded by reminding him of the failure of the government he supported in the past.

Yesufu is known for her advocacy work and has been criticized for her positions on national issues.

Her investigative reports often create conflicts between her and the subjects of her findings.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *